MN GIS/LIS NEWS
The Newsletter of the Minnesota GIS/LIS Consortium
Table of Contents
MN GIS/LIS Consortium
From the Chair
Drive to Excellence Update
USNG in Minnesota
Mn/DOT GIS Portal
LCC-GIS and Redistricting
CTU and USNG standards out for review
Next Generation 9-1-1
GIS at RNC
Services Forum Results
Address Point Synchronization
Tracking Utility Trucks
Watershed E. coli Study
Improvng Flood Maps
URISA Skills Survey
MHS Map Exhibit
Randy Johnson, ESRI GIS Hero
Web 2.0 for Local Government
Economics and Place
|MetroGIS Launches New Web Services Workgroups
By Mark Kotz, Chair, MetroGIS Technical Leadership Workgroup
In November 2008, MetroGIS held a Geospatial Applications and Web Services Needs Forum. Twenty-three representatives from various stakeholder groups identified and prioritized 42 different ideas for needed applications and web services. Details can be found in the forum turnaround document .
The results of the forum were further analyzed by the MetroGIS Technical Leadership Workgroup, which recommended that five new workgroups be launched to focus on the following priority needs:
- A web service that would list all jurisdictions that exist at a particular point (e.g. city, county, school district, voting precinct, etc.) and the closely associated need for a web service or application that finds appropriate or nearest government services based on a particular location.
- Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) compliant feature services available for all geospatial data and feature services available in a secured environment.
- A web service that shows the "best" imagery available. The big question is what constitutes "best".
- A service that determines if the U.S. Postal Service will mail to a given address and that also provides the USPS standardized formatting of that address.
- A federated data development environment strategy that facilitates the creation and maintenance of a single metro-wide dataset by multiple authoritative sources.
In response to these recommendations, more than 24 volunteers have stepped forward, helping to begin forming the first four workgroups. The fifth workgroup is on hold awaiting progress on this topic by the MetroGIS Address Workgroup which is working on a model of federated data development for address points data. An additional workgroup to focus on data for landmarks is also proposed.
Each workgroup has been asked to decide if funding will be needed to accomplish their charge and, if so, to offer a proposal for consideration by the Coordinating Committee this spring. The 2009 MetroGIS budget includes $35,000 for these purposes.
For more information, contact Mark Kotz at email@example.com or 651-602-1644.