MN GIS/LIS NEWS
Spring 2010
ISSUE 60

MN GIS/LIS NEWS
The Newsletter of the Minnesota GIS/LIS Consortium

Table of Contents

MN GIS/LIS Consortium

From the Chair
Conference Planning 
Salary Survey Results

State
MN Compass
TB Monitoring in Deer
Stimulus Map Phase 2

MN Geospatial Commons Planned

Regional
New Arrowhead Imagery
Metro Address Point Specs

Local
GIS in Sewer Inspections - New Brighton

Federal
New Generation Topos
Topo Anniversary
The National Map Update
Crop Productivity Index
Crop Data Layer
Census Participation Maps
Occupations Website

Non-Profits
GeoMoose New Version
ESRI Grant Program
Guide to Nonprofit GIS and Online Mapping

Other Places
SC Data Policy Development Guide
Map Quizzes

 

 

Crop Productivity Index Ratings for Minnesota
Adapted from NRCS website

Crop productivity index ratings from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) provide a relative ranking of soils based on their potential for intensive crop production. An index can be used to rate the potential yield of one soil against that of another over a period of time. Ratings range from 0 to 100. The higher numbers indicate higher production potential.

CPI ratings supersede the Crop Equivalent Ratings historically computed by the University of Minnesota's Department of Soil, Water and Climate.

Computing the ratings

CPI ratings do not take into account climatic factors, such as the differences in precipitation or growing degree days across Minnesota. The ratings are based on physical and chemical properties of the soils and on such hazards as flooding or ponding. Available water capacity, reaction (pH), slope, soil moisture status, cation-exchange capacity (CEC), organic matter content, salinity, and surface fragments are the major properties evaluated when CPI ratings are generated. The soil properties selected are those that are important for the production of corn.

All soil component mapping phases in Minnesota were evaluated using the Cropland Productivity rule in the National Soil Information System (NASIS), and a CPI was generated for each phase. A statistical mean CPI value was created for each soil component mapping phase. All map units were populated with each component’s mean CPI value, and a weighted average CPI was created for each soil map unit in the state. An individual map unit (for example, Canisteo clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes) will have the same CPI value wherever that map unit occurs throughout the state.

When the soils are rated, the following assumptions are made:

  1. adequate management
  2. natural weather conditions (no irrigation)
  3. artificial drainage where required
  4. no climatic factors considered
  5. no land leveling or terracing.

Even though predicted average yields will change with time, the productivity indices are expected to remain relatively constant in relation to one another over time.

Obtaining CPI maps, tables, and spreadsheets

Maps and tables:  NRCS provides maps and tables of crop productivity index ratings via the Web Soil Survey. After choosing your Area of Interest and creating your soil map, go to the Soil Data Explorer tab, choose Vegetative Productivity, choose Crop Productivity Index, and then check "View Rating". See graphic for a larger view of a sample map.

Spreadsheets:  Spreadsheets of values in Excel (.xls) format are available by county in the Electronic Field Office Technical Guide (once you are at the eFOTG site, click on the map to navigate to Minnesota and then to a specific county. In the eFOTG menu, go to Section II, then section A. County Soils Information, then the county folder, then section e. Cropland Interpretations).

More Information

If you have further questions about CPI Ratings, contact Kim Steffen at NRCS’s St. Paul office:  kim.steffen@mn.usda.gov or 651-602-7891.